Opinion: Drought-prompted AgriStability changes not a sign of continued co-operation

Opinion: Drought-prompted AgriStability changes not a sign of continued co-operation

A drought forced the federal and western Canadian governments to reach an agreement on AgriStability but is it a sign of what’s to come?

Near the start of August, the two governments agreed to allow Saskatchewan producers early access to the 2021 payments to which they are entitled. 

The two ministers of agriculture involved, Marie-Claude Bibeau and David Marit, put out a joint press release outlining how the move would allow producers better access to cash.

As we’ve seen throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, negative forces can bring competing factions together. 

In this instance, the drought more or less demanded cooperation between the conservative politicians running Saskatchewan and the liberals running Ottawa.

Apparently, though, it will take more than a drought or global pandemic for the two to truly get on the same page over AgriStability. 

Changes to the program have long been debated. 

In 2020, Bibeau offered to continue splitting the bill of the program 60-40 with the provinces, while increasing the overall cost of AgriStability by making it easier for producers to access and paying them more when they do get a payout. 

After more than a year of negotiations, provinces agreed with Ottawa in March to remove the reference margin limit from AgriStability but the prospect of further short-term changes remains dim.

Prairie provinces don’t want to pay more, and are investing resources to explore a Whole Farm Margin Insurance (WFMI) program that would insure an entire farming enterprise for a margin decline from revenue fluctuations, expense changes or a combination of the two.

The Grain Growers of Canada is openly pleading with governments to “put politics aside” and encouraged the acceptance of Ottawa’s offer. Ontario recently announced that it was unilaterally increasing its AgriStability contribution and urged the Canadian government to add in its promised increase, but it is refusing to do so until more provinces sign on.

In a press release, the Grain Growers of Canada recognized provinces are facing financial challenges but reiterated an investment in agriculture is “more than worth it.”

“This is a time where we must come together,” said GGC chair Andre Harpe. “We need everyone at the table to avoid playing politics and act quickly to provide an actionable and accessible support system for farmers.”

It’s tough for politicians to avoid playing politics, but it can be done. 

And, outside of politics, it is tough to understand what else is at play here.

The federal government is willing to unlock $45 million to increase compensation rates to farmers. To make that happen, the provinces must agree to collectively contribute $30 million.

The Prairie provinces continue to prevent this.

Any wholesale replacement of AgriStability favoured by the Prairie provinces won’t become a reality until it can be ushered in with the next version of the federal-provincial agricultural funding agreement. That isn’t happening until 2023.

Why not make the existing program better now, while you can? 

Disasters, like droughts and pandemics, can force competing factions to work together. The minor changes recently announced to AgriStability once again prove this can be the case, but further co-operation on the file isn’t likely.

About the author


D.C. Fraser

D.C. Fraser is Glacier FarmMedia’s Ottawa-based reporter. Growing up mostly in Alberta, Fraser also lived in Saskatchewan for ten years where he covered politics, including a stint teaching at the University of Regina’s School of Journalism. He is an avid fan of the outdoors and a pretty good beer league hockey player. His passion for agriculture and agri-food policy comes naturally: Six consecutive generations of his family have worked in the industry.



Stories from our other publications